how reductive theory doesnt account for consciousness
write a 3 -5 page paper on: Nagel argues that reductive theories (functionalism, identity theory) do not account for consciousness. Can reductive theories be defended against this concern? Your essay should include three sections: first, an explanation of Nagel’s argument, which includes his conception of consciousness and why he thinks reductive theories cannot explain consciousness; second, a defense of physicalism (which may draw from Churchland’s article or you may construct a potential defense of your own); third, a discussion of whether your stated defense is successful.
Requirements:
1.Works cited page if you are using sources I did not assign; otherwise, parenthetical references that include page number and author will suffice.
2.Direct text references: provide text references to verify your interpretation of the views; merely citing page numbers where the issue is discussed is not enough.
3. Introductory paragraph should include a thesis that clearly answers the question and summarizes the reasons for your position, and roadmap
must pull quotes directly from Nagel’s article in t”the elements of philosophy “ readings from past and present. his specific part is titled consciousness and perception “what’s it like to be a bat”
