ROL pinch table
A Review of Literature is conducted to generate an understanding of what is known and not known about a topic of interest. You have identified a topic/problem in Module 1 Discussion Board – Research Problem and found four related study articles in Module 4. In this assignment, you will create a Pinch Table of study articles as part of a Review of Literature following the guidelines in Gray, Grove, and Sutherland (2017) and use a Pinch Table to share your review. Submit your PINCH Table here (as a Word Doc) to the assignment link first, and then your four articles in pdf format. Your PINCH Table is to be submitted using the template below ONLY. If the assignment is not submitted within this Template, it is an automatic 50 points off.
Absolutely NO cutting and pasting allowed in this assignment.
ROL Pinch Table Instructions and Rubric
ROL Pinch Table Template
Rubric
Review of Literature, Pinch Table
Review of Literature, Pinch Table
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Problem
10 to >8.0 pts
Accomplished
Clinical problem is discussed with citations. Gap in the research literature is identified and described.
8 to >3.0 pts
Competent
Significance of problem vague. Gap in the research literature is not well described. No citation given.
3 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Problem or gap is not discussed.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Article # 1 Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 5 points per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.
20 to >16.0 pts
Accomplished
Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article.
16 to >6.0 pts
Competent
Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.
6 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Article # 2 Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 5 points per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.
20 to >16.0 pts
Accomplished
Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article.
16 to >6.0 pts
Competent
Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.
6 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Article # 3 Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 5 points per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.
20 to >16.0 pts
Accomplished
Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article.
16 to >6.0 pts
Competent
Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.
6 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Article # 4 Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 5 points per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.
20 to >16.0 pts
Accomplished
Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article.
16 to >6.0 pts
Competent
Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.
6 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Formatting and APA Style
10 to >8.0 pts
Accomplished
PinchTable used for assignment. Pinch Table organized and readable. Spelling counts. Reference page included with no citation errors.
8 to >3.0 pts
Competent
Pinch Table disorganized with errors. -1 point off for each error on formatting and basic readability.
3 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
More than 7 errors
10 pts
Total Points: 100
