Summarize your “new” performance appraisal and explain the criteria and competencies you selected. Justify your rationale for the areas you’ve selected.
Employers of today focus on several types of performance appraisals. The below article discusses how more employers are shifting from the traditional numerical ranking system performance appraisals to a qualitative approach.
Read the article from the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) by Dori Meinert, (2015): Is it Time to Put the Performance Review on a PIP? (Links to an external site.)
Your supervisor has tasked you with creating a new performance appraisal system for your department. Your first step is to determine what criteria and competencies are to be evaluated.
Write an essay of at least 250 words, double-spaced, with proper reference citation per current APA guidelines. Ensure you have a cover page, introduction, body, and conclusion for your essay and include:
Summarize your “new” performance appraisal and explain the criteria and competencies you selected. Justify your rationale for the areas you’ve selected.
Why will your new performance appraisal better assess and measure employees’ work performance?
What is your intended employee and organizational outcomes for your new type of appraisal? How would a fair and equitable performance appraisal increase motivation in your department? Justify and support your rationale.
Ensure you have credible resources to support your responses.
Academic Integrity
Upon submission, your assignment will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin. Your paper will be checked against a database of millions of written works and provide feedback on originality. You may view your originality report; however, you will not be permitted to submit your paper a second time. Ensure your work is entirely your own and cite your sources, if applicable!
Submission
Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number or description. Do not add punctuation or special characters to the file name. Submit your completed assignment as an attachment to your instructor through this activity.
Review the evaluation rubric for detailed grading criteria.
Rubric
MGMT 201 – 3.3 Critial Thinking Questions Rubric
MGMT 201 – 3.3 Critial Thinking Questions Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis
All ideas are clearly and logically related and supports prompts/thesis: transitions are clear and easy to follow. Fully supports and develops ideas with research.
60.0 pts
Superior (54 – 60 pts)
53.0 pts
Above Average (48 – 53 pts)
47.0 pts
Average (40 – 47 pts)
41.0 pts
Below Average (36 – 41 pts)
35.0 pts
Failure (0 – 35 pts)
60.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization
Introduction provides all necessary elements of information; sets clear expectations; conclusion is decisive, creates a fully satisfying sense of completion.
15.0 pts
Superior (14 – 15 pts)
13.0 pts
Above Average (12 – 13 pts)
11.0 pts
Average
10.0 pts
Below Average
9.0 pts
Failure (0 – 9 pts)
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Research and References
Excellent research into the issues with clearly documented links to class and required two or more outside references (not including the course textbook) supporting the content. Quotes are less than 10% of the paper. In-text citations are used for support and clarity. Formatting of in-text citations and references must follow APA guidelines.
15.0 pts
Superior (14 – 15 pts)
13.0 pts
Above Average (12 – 13 pts)
11.0 pts
Average
10.0 pts
Below Average
9.0 pts
Failure (0 – 9 pts)
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Mechanics
No major grammar, punctuation, or spelling errors and paragraphs always unified and coherent.
10.0 pts
Superior
9.0 pts
Above Average
8.0 pts
Average
7.0 pts
Below Average
6.0 pts
Failure (0 – 6 pts)
10.0 pts
